Some Comparisons of Montessori Education With
Traditional Education
Montessori children are unusually adaptable. They have
learned to work independently and in groups. Since
they’ve been encouraged to make decisions from an
early age, these children are problem-solvers who can make
appropriate choices and manage their time well.
They have been encouraged to exchange ideas and discuss
their work freely with others. Their good communication
skills ease the way in new settings.
Research has shown that the best predictor of future
success is a positive sense of self-esteem. Montessori
programs, based on self-directed, non-competitive
activities, help children develop strong self-images and
the confidence to face challenges and change with optimism.
Montessori
• Emphasis on: cognitive structures and social
development
• Teacher has unobtrusive role in classroom activity;
child is an active participant in learning
• Environment and method encourage internal
self-discipline
• Instructions, both individual and group, adapts to
each student’s learning style
• Mixed age grouping
• Children are encouraged to teach, collaborate, and
help each other
• Child chooses own work from interests and abilities
• Child formulates own concepts from self-teaching
materials
• Child works as long as he/she wishes on a chosen
project
• Child sets own learning pace to internalize
information
• Child spots own errors through feedback from the
material
• Learning is reinforced internally through the
child’s own repetition of an activity and internal
feelings of success
• Multi-sensory materials for physical exploration
• Organized program for learning care of self and
environment (polishing shoes, cleaning the sink, etc.)
• Child can work where he/she is comfortable, moves
around and talks at will (yet disturbs not the work of
others); group work is voluntary and negotiable.
• Organized program for parents to understand the
Montessori philosophy and participate in the learning
process
Traditional
• Emphasis on: rote knowledge and social development
• Teacher has dominant, active role in classroom
activity; child is a passive participant in learning
• Teacher acts as primary enforcer of external
discipline
• Instruction, both individual and group, conforms to
the adult’s teaching style
• Same age grouping
• Most teaching is done by teacher and collaboration
is discouraged
• Curriculum structured for child with little regard
for child’s interests
• Child is guided to concepts by teacher
• Child generally given specific time limit for work
• Instruction pace usually set by group norm or
teacher
• If work is corrected, errors usually pointed out by
teacher
• Learning is reinforced externally byb rote
repetition and rewards/discouragements
• Fewer materials for sensory development and concrete
manipulation
• Less emphasis on self-care instruction and classroom
maintenance
• Child usually assigned own chair; encouraged to sit
still and listen during group sessions
• Voluntary parent involvement, often only as
fundraisers, not participants in understanding the learning
process